CONNtemplations The Online Presence of Connecticut Law Review

Vulnerable Victims: Increasing Animal Cruelty Sentences to Reflect Society’s Understanding of the Value of Animal Lives

When Michael Vick pleaded guilty to masterminding a dogfighting operation that resulted in the intentional killing of six to eight dogs—some by hanging or drowning—he was sentenced to only twenty-three months imprisonment.  Alarmingly, Vick’s sentence was among the harshest imposed at the federal level for animal cruelty offenses that routinely involve the torture, maiming, and [...]

Read More :: View PDF

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius: The Constitutionality of Health Care Reform and the Spending Clause

The United States Supreme Court recently upheld the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as “Obamacare,” as a valid exercise of congressional authority.  The decision, which was one of the most anxiously anticipated in years, caught many people by surprise when Chief Justice Roberts sided with the liberal wing of the Court and [...]

Read More :: View PDF

Dangerousness and the Civil–Criminal Distinction: Another Reason to Rethink the Indefinite Detention of Sex Offenders

This Essay builds upon the conclusions of Professor Vars in his Article, Rethinking the Indefinite Detention of Sex Offenders.  Focusing on the faultiness of an actuarial tool often used to assess dangerousness, Vars argues convincingly that the predictions of future dangerousness in sex offender civil commitment hearings are deeply flawed.  This Essay contends that Vars’s [...]

Read More :: View PDF

Fractious Form 18

Drafted decades before the advent of the personal computer and the digital age, Form 18 of the Federal Rules of Procedure, which sets forth a fill-in-the-blank template for a patent infringement complaint, has come under increasing scrutiny from litigants and courts around the country in the wake of Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft [...]

Read More :: View PDF

MERS is Dead: Long Live MERS

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) has generated substantial controversy and academic analysis about its ubiquitous appearance in countless mortgage foreclosure actions.  As the ostensible mortgagee under millions of borrowers’ home loans, MERS’s unique relationship with lenders, servicers, and homeowners has resulted in widely disparate judicial treatment across the nation. Although a seemingly large majority [...]

Read More :: View PDF

On the Abuse and Limits of Lawyer Discipline

Despite being routinely underfunded, lawyer disciplinary processes must operate in ways that merit the confidence of both society at large and the American legal profession.  This means that those who participate in lawyer grievance adjudication must be vigilant against systemic abuse (whether deliberate or unintentional) and mindful of factors that limit institutional competence.  This Essay [...]

Read More :: View PDF

Debating Over Backyard Chickens

This paper supplements our Article, Excessive Speech, Civility Norms, and the Clucking Theorem.  The paper documents the debates and controversies over backyard chicken laws in forty localities between 2007 and 2010.  The paper also examines relevant legal transitions in three states—Alabama, California, and Georgia.  The Clucking Theorem is available at 44 Conn. L. Rev. 1 [...]

Read More :: View PDF

Eyes Wide Shut: The Perils of Failing to Take Action to Undo Fraudulent Transfers Before Entry of a Restitution Order

The Mandatory Victims Restitution Act enables the Federal Government to recover statutorily mandated restitution from criminal offenders to compensate the victims of fraud and other corporate crimes.  According to a report issued by the Government Accountability Office, the Department of Justice lacks the statutory authority to obtain pre-conviction restraints on funds in order to satisfy [...]

Read More :: View PDF

Remembering Privacy and Regulation

In a brief response to Eric Miller’s Forget Privacy, Alfred Brophy reminds us that the Warren Court was concerned with a number of allied issues, including privacy (and what Miller refers to as “personal security”) and regulation of government action.  Remembering Privacy and Regulation suggests that the Warren Court drew upon a deep well of [...]

Read More :: View PDF

Hitting the Sweet Spot by Accident: How Recent Lower Court Cases Help Realign Incentives in the Credit Rating Industry

Broad reliance on excessively optimistic credit ratings of structured financial products helped ignite and spread the recent financial crisis. A misalignment of incentives at rating agencies such as Fitch Inc., Moody’s Corporation, and Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) contributed significantly to this excessive optimism. One proposal for better aligning incentives is to facilitate more lawsuits against [...]

Read More :: View PDF